Green And Gold Till The Club Is Sold

The What?

Having experienced the most successful period in the club’s history including a hat trick of league titles, back to back European Cup finals and the biggest transfer business ever in the history of football, one wouldn’t expect any manager to be stifled with money but as a certain Mr. Murphy once said – “Anything that can go wrong will go wrong”. This is the only explanation you can attribute to the present day situation that Sir Alex Ferguson and Manchester United find themselves confronting.

Till about five years back, Manchester United were a club with absolutely zero debt but today our beloved club has a gorilla on its back that threatens its very existence. Make no mistake – the vultures of Wall Street have been hovering over Sir Matt Busby Way.

Sports News - April 03, 2010

United fans protest outside Old Trafford

Every United supporter had a sense of the debt staring in our club’s face – the debt brought upon by the current owners; but being a privately held enterprise, the question was how much and in what shape and form?

Ironically, all this would not have come to light had the wrongdoings of the very same financial czars all over the world not be exposed in the past two years. The United owners were coasting comfortably till the economic climate changed which brought along the need to refinance the debt and in fact emphasized the decision to go via Bonds route. Yes, there was a deadline to refinance the senior debt of £500Mn as well but it could very well have gone a different way, other than bonds which involved the public disclosure of finances, had the situation allowed to do so. The most important aspect of which was the Payment-in-kind (PIK) loans, a throne in the whole refinancing situation.

The Why?

Let us go back a little in time, till the bond issue came into light, which made the whole fan base sit up and take notice. After 2005, United were saddled with £500 mn of Senior debt owed to the commercial banks and roughly £100Mn odd of PIK loans owed to Hedge Funds – which has now accumulated to £200Mn.

The £500Mn of senior debt was on the interest of around 5% YOY whereas the PIKs are owed at around 15% YOY. There was a deadline approaching for senior debt to be paid off this year and it had certain covenants which didn’t allow the owners to pay-off PIKs till now by taking money out of the club’s revenues.

The only way these covenants could have been gotten rid off was if bonds was chosen as a mode of refinancing and not just another round of senior debt from another commercial bank. Due to the huge interest on PIK loans, it had become the priority for Glazers to pay them off the interest of which is roughly 20-30Mn every year.

After the bond issue, £500Mn of senior debt has been replaced by £500Mn of bonds – on 9% interest YOY – which doesn’t place the covenants to restrict Glazers to pay-off PIKs. Effectively, the net interest payments are increased on the club but it has brought freedom to the owners to pay-off PIKs, not to mention the time till 2017, the seven-year length of the bond issue.

Wild Card Game: Washington Redskins v Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Malcolm Glazer – Man under pressure

The simple fact is that with the bond issue, the Glazers have bought time till 2017 in which they envisage the club valuation to go up and an opportunity to make a hefty profit. This should in fact clarify that the owners’ association is not merely out of perpetual love for the club as it is proclaimed, rather the fundamental rule of business valuation. The bond prospectus also highlights the various payments in the name of management fee which have been taken out of club revenue bleeding the club all this while.

Although it’s a fair practice to highlight the risks involved while floating any investment offer, but the risks mentioned in the bond prospectus such as sale of Carrington and Old Trafford have sent the shiver down the spines of United supporters. A quick look at numbers and it suggests that United have a net spend of roughly and most importantly only around £1.2M per season since the Glazers took over vis-à-vis around £10M per season since the Premier League was formed. The whole saga makes Mike Ashley look a great owner.

The How?

In the whole narrative of exploitation, the real victims are the supporters; especially the season ticket holders and the stadium-visiting supporters. These supporters, who have continued to support the club with ever more passion and love despite externalities like an adverse economic climate, had to contend with the ticket prices which have more than doubled in the last five years. But the horror show put forth by the bond issue was too much to take.

After understanding the whole maze of numbers, United supporters who till now had been living in quiet desperation, decided to do something about it. The wave of green and gold, conceptualized in one meeting of the Manchester United Supporters’ Trust (MUST) has started a revolution which saw supporters embracing the old colors and taking every opportunity on a matchday to make their intentions known to the owners.

The membership of MUST went up from 30,000 to more than 150,000 in a matter of hours and this reflects how the supporters all over the globe feel about the situation. Looking back in time, the green and gold represented the working class ethos of this club, back when it was called ‘Newton Heath‘, of which the present day’s reincarnation is Manchester United. This club has always those values entrenched in its roots, represented by the working class heroes such as Sir Matt Busby and Sir Alex.

Football - Manchester United v Portsmouth Barclays Premier League

The Green & Gold out in full force at OT

Along with the organized campaign of MUST and other supporters’ trusts, another revolution has been brewing in. Red Knights, the forty odd United fans that happen to be ultra-rich, have presented themselves as a silver lining in the dark cloud and provided an opportunity for the supporters to own the club. The shining example of such utopian dream is a club like Barcelona where ‘Cules’ have a major say in how the club is run.

Over the past three months, the ‘Red Knights’ – which include some prominent figures of the financial world – have made their intentions known and are focusing their energies to raise enough money to buy back the club from the Glazers. This increased momentum has seen Knights taking some concrete steps like signing investment banks like Nomura to help in the bid process. As per various reports in the media, Knights estimate that a bid of £1.2Bn pounds is likely to make Glazers interested.

Apart from £500 mn of bonds, the Knights are likely to raise around two thirds of £700mn among themselves and rest from the supporters with the eventual aim of complete ownership by fans. Although the Red Knights have announced they would wait till the end of the season before making a bid, especially not to distract matters on-the-field, it remains to be seen how much the green and gold will be supported by the Red Knights.

Doubters are not far behind in any romantic story. The muted response of Sir Alex and apparent backing of Glazers is well highlighted whenever Red Knights are mentioned in the media. One can assume it has to do with Ferguson’s apparent dislike for a larger board to deal with as seen from the PLC days. Of course, it would be naive to expect Sir Alex and David Gill to revolt against their employers in public. The interview given by David Gill in 2004 when Glazers first approached the club for takeover tells you the change in Gill’s stance today, albeit a bit forced you might think as it is.

There are other apprehensions which linger in supporters’ minds. Whether the mystery Red Knights can actually pull it off? Aren’t they the representatives of the same financial world? If they keep the bonds debt status quo, how different would it be from the current structure? Wouldn’t the multiple owners present a conflict of interest? Can one realistically expect any fan to invest millions of pounds just for the sake of club and not looking for returns at any perceivable opportunity? All these questions are unanswered at this stage and one has to wait and watch the true aspirations of Red Knights till the summer. There is a need for caution here as a wise man once said “Be careful what you wish for”. This is the sort of philosophical quandary United supporters find themselves in.

Until then, Manchester United and Sir Alex will live to fight another day till this famous club is back to where it belongs.

  • Soccerfan


  • redNblack_blood

    very well written…….

  • Wonderful article! Now I understand the whole situation behind the Green and Gold brigade.

  • sarad

    Well written Ashish.

    Unfortunate situation is such: the intensity of the problem would be known once we don’t manage to get results on the pitch.

  • In theory the Red Knights sounds great but there are a few fundamental questions which remains unanswered, which leads me to question the very viability of this option

    Who are these so-called extremely wealthy owners?

    Assuming that they have to raise some 700m, that would mean each of them would need to sink in amounts in the vicinity of 50m.

    It is fair to assume that the people willing to sink in 50m are extremely rich and have brains which can keep emotions away from business. Come on it is 50m. For all their love for the club, nobody will sink in that much money WITHOUT expecting decent returns. Now already Glazers have maximized revenue potential to the highest level possible. How will these rich men make money?

    The only way someone will sink in money without expecting anything is if the person is acting as a sugar daddy like Chelsea. But in that case how will the group of 20 people manage to keep their egos aside. That is even more scarier. 20 people having ego clashes in the boardroom fighting to control the direction of the club.

    Glazers model is built upon the premise that the club will be continue to be successful in the medium term. Only if the success dries out, the club needs to worry about its existence.

  • sarad

    It would be very important to see if these fans put their own money or borrowed money. If they put their own money, they wud show more patience, other wise it would not be much different than the current set-up. In this case atleast time is there till 2017.

    And 20 men boardroom will be caos – that’s only reason, why SAF (not that we expect him to revolt against his employer) has not voiced his support to the red knights.

  • zaid

    well as sarad rightly pointed out.. the major problems start and will hurt more when we stop getting the results on the pitch!! having said that.. cant really watch these Smart A** American Owners destroying the Club’s Legacy..
    As for the Red Knights.. well its agr8 initiative.. but again.. 20 people.. varied opinions.. patience.. too many things to be considered…
    a worrying situation for sure…but then again.. its

  • Ashish

    @ Arvind,

    Glazers and in fact the other yanks G&H from Liverpool all are supposed to have banked on the TV deal to unlock the revenue potential of United and Liverpool respectively. This of course isn’t happening as of now, but then who’s to say what will happen in the future. Then like i mentioned in the blog, football is more about valuation.
    Even if there is relatively less room for increasing revenue, club’s valuation can go a lot higher in comparison.

    You are correct there is no guarantee that these red knights will keep their ego in check. The good thing is if 1-2 of red knights decide to sell their share, fans could be given priority in ownership as the likely norms of the ownership if at all red knights come in, will have these kinds of covenants in place.